Spin Sisters sell stress, sob stories and diets
Ever wonder why women are so liberal?
Standing in the ferry bookshop last week, I found myself saying, out loud:
"Where are all the grown-up magazines?" What I was staring at was the wall of
mass-market glossies, almost all aimed at women, and all, over the last decade,
increasingly infantile. Do any of the blond, tweaked creatures on those covers
bear any individual distinguishing features? Do any of them eat? Do any of them
say anything interesting? Ever? I wheeled towards the cashier, and found The
Economist, Business Week and The New Yorker, which grows increasingly
infantile, politically speaking, every week, but at least Jennifer Aniston is
not on the cover.
Spin Sisters, How The Women of the Media Sell Unhappiness and Liberalism to the
Women of America by Myrna Blyth, once the long- time editor of the biggest
glossy of them all, Ladies Home Journal, takes down the big-foot girl magazine
world, strips it naked and spreads it out on the examining table in all its
tawdry circus glory. The book, just published, is one of those hell-bent
convert books, written at top speed, in the style made instantly classic by Ann
Coulter. The author has had an earth-shattering series of revelations, her
world-view has shifted radically, and she simply must share it with us.
Which is good, because it means the book can be read in a couple of sittings.
Compelling reading it makes too. Blyth has a lot to say, in many areas, but it
can be reduced to the following. The Spin Sisters, the powerful editors of
glossies like Vogue, Bazaar, Marie Claire, Glamour, Family Circle, and the even
more powerful Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters, the ladies of The
View, have but one thing to teach us: Narcissism is an advanced evolutionary
stage of female liberation.
Or, in other words: Me. Me. Me. Me. Me. I'm finally free, free, free, free,
free.
And do they have power. The academy, studying something useful for once, has
analyzed it. Professor Sherrie A. Inness, states that the Sisters "convince
millions that the views expressed by such magazines are just, fair and
truthful." Brit commentator Valery Bryson writes: "Many women who are
uninterested in politics as defined by men gain political information and
values not from serious newspapers and broadcasts from women's magazines and
daytime television." Fifty-five million women in the States and Canada buy
these magazines every month.
Tens of millions more watch day-time television. More, these stories inform the
background conversation of all women. For as any honest woman will tell you,
when women talk, they talk about their troubles. In the absence of real
trouble, we'll make some up, just to belong to the cool girls' club, just for a
moment. Furthermore, trouble told in great and tragic detail is a kind of
amulet against the jealousy of other women. Don't attack me, we tell each
other. I'm too weak and pathetic to bother about. Men brandish their
armarariums, we roll over, show our pudgy bellies and play victim.
So that's what the Spin Sisters sell. Victims in Trouble. Stress, stress and
more stress. Diseases and diets. Environmental scare stories. Sob stories
leading inevitably to the demand for more government in every corner and
hideaway of life. All this bolstered by heavily-negotiated, contracted-down-to-
the-last air-brushed "revelation," cover stories about powder puffs like Renee
Zellweger.
The facts?Liza Featherstone of the Columbia Journalism Review quotes a fact
checker from Mademoiselle saying that "these stories were so tweaked, that fact
checking them was not a priority." A Glamour employee who spoke to Blyth
acknowledged that quotes are routinely rewritten, anecdotes almost always
exaggerated.
And out of step with the real world. In Blyth's content study, she found that
over the past three years there were almost 300 stories of victimized women and
almost 300 more stories of women who avenge some kind of victimization,
averaging two in every issue. But according to the Department of Justice's
National Crime Victimization Survey, crime rates in each crime category in 2001
in New York City, where apparently most of these stories originate, were the
lowest they had been since 1973.
In sharp contrast to the heavy breathing from magazines like Cosmopolitan and
Glamour, sold to under 25s, 31% of college seniors were found recently to be
virgins. Stories like "50 Ways To Make Great Sack Session Sex-traordinary,"
shout from every cover, every month, promote sexual liberation. But a typical
university student is likely to say what this New York University student did
say: "I don't think women deal well with (hooking up) ... the next day they're
upset and they regret what they did and (they ask themselves) 'Why did I do
it?' "
"For the last two decades, we've been told over and over again, that if we are
women, we are, de facto, victims because of the stress in our lives, because of
the dangers in our environment, because of our need to be attractive in order
to please men, and because of the inherently dangerous, violent nature of men.
We, who are certainly the most fortunate women the world has ever known, remain
a victim class," says Blyth, trumpeting her main point.
And what do victims need? A nice, strong government. A big government. A
compassionate government. Government as good Daddy. The CBC, big government in
tights and makeup, has turned all Canadians into victims needing Daddy's help,
with the predictable results of an entire country underperforming, afraid of
our own shadow, assigning more power to the government every day, starving the
private sector, driving the most talented out. Nothing the Spin Sisters (or the
CBC) puts out promotes personal responsibility, or reflects the politics and
spirituality of Middle America or Canada.
One comforting thing to ponder. Advertising Age reported last year that
newsstand sales of women's magazines were falling. And falling dramatically.
The nursery is emptying fast.