The Conservatives must attack Kyoto:
SALT SPRING ISLAND - My friends are obsessed with their health. Like all
urbanites pitched up in the country, I guess, first they wondered what to do,
now they wonder where the time goes. One place it goes is outside. Nothing gets
you higher than a two-hour hike in a mountain rain forest in the dead of
winter, or a four-hour ride through same. In the summer, a kayak is the drug of
choice. We also love nutritional supplements. A new addition to my pod, is an
American with a degree in Oriental Medicine, and we're like kids in a candy
store, prying out various bits of knowledge and pawing through her (wholesale)
supplements. Last week, she'd sent some artemesium to a friend of a friend
who'd spent 25 winters on the beach in Kenya without a hat. Naturally he now
has fourth-stage melanoma. He applied the artemesium, and after a day, chunks
of tumour began to fall off his head, leaving pink skin behind. Another friend
uses bee stings to hold his MS in remission. This is excellent stuff and can
form the core of many conversations. Learn to avoid the medical system as much
as you can now, is our philosophy, since if we really need it in a decade or
two or three, it will not be there.
I wish I could say we were special, but we aren't. Everyone with the time and
money to do so, is bent on feeling good and strong, and nature keeps coming up
with the solutions to illnesses of every kind. Increasingly respectful we are
too, collectively, of the ground beneath our feet, the air and water we drink,
and increasingly desirous of taking care of ourselves, and not assigning body
and mind to the federal government. These days, everyone's an environmentalist.
Which is why the candidates for the leadership of the Conservative party never
mention Kyoto. Canada has only one articulated environmental policy, and that
is the policy that leads directly to a dangerous and massive uber-state. Our
anti-corporate fervour, the fear of modernism, a desire to return (like the
late Victorians) to the Middle Ages, to slow things down therefore live
forever, play into the hands of irresponsible fame addicts like David Anderson
and David Suzuki. Both travel the country ceaselessly selling shrill and
preposterous tales of doom, flooding, mega- extinctions, and poisoned future
generations. Both grow more crackpot and divorced from reality by the day.
Neither seem to understand science. nevertheless both are supported by our
government. Not only that, but they have persuaded other power figures,
corporate leaders who should know better, to sing the same song. A Pentagon
scenario that was meant as a war game, was reported two weeks ago by
environmental groups to state inconclusively that climate change was the number
one security threat to the world, even outranking global terrorism. Business is
preparing for doom by charging higher premiums. Reuters reported a couple of
weeks ago that "the world's second-largest reinsurer, Swiss Re, warned that the
costs of natural disasters, aggravated by global warming, threatened to spiral
out of control, forcing the human race into a catastrophe of its own making."
They can just smell the money. Especially as the premiums can go up, but global
warming, as increasing numbers of actual scientists will tell you is not
happening.
Little wonder everyone is so freaked out. Which is why we could use some clear,
strong leadership from the Conservative Party of Canada on this brief. What
they've thrown out so far sounds awfully weak and whooshy. Makes me think that
if, by some miracle they won, they'd end up taking the advice of that corrupt
and expensive bureaucracy already in place. "Oh, that's why we can't do that,"
I hear them saying. "Oh, OK. Well forget about it."
But they can't win without showing some strength on this brief. Stephen
Harper's environment policy does have meat. There are specific, useful programs
outlined, and a reference to the Liberals' general inefficiency. But there is
no wholesale attack on Kyoto, no serious take-down of the increasingly dubious
science of Kyoto. Why is that? Is it because the forces arrayed to support and
push through Kyoto are so overwhelming? Is it because anyone who challenges
Kyoto is immediately branded as a right-wing extremist?
I suspect so. Stephen Harper can give a speech on the science of Kyoto and trot
out the hundreds of scientists from all over the world who state that Kyoto is
rubbish, and it won't even make the back page. A Hollywood star can buy a
hybrid car (she has no intention of replacing the Range Rover), she gets Page
Three, and all her compassionate idiocy is lovingly transcribed for the ages.
Yet without a strongly articulated, activist policy on the environment the
Conservative party will lose. And without depending utterly on science, no
environmental policy can be articulated. Therefore, any first step must be to
show Kyoto to be the fiction it is.
Then the gloves can come off. All over the world, for the past 30 years,
countries, towns, cities and neighbourhoods have developed co- operative, low-
cost, low-impact ways to save their environment, without creating massive
bureaucracies. It is there that the successes are to be found, and there are
many. Overfishing can be dealt with by leasing the oceans. Ocean pollution can
be tracked and prosecuted. Our air is much much cleaner than it was 30 years
ago. Clean water for the Third World is far more important than capping energy
emissions. Canada alone could have already solved this last problem using all
the money the Anderson has hitherto thrown away on Kyoto. Saving local beauty
spots is a wonderful thing for a local community to work on together.
Populations of birds, whales, fish and mammals come back, all the time. Actual
extinctions remain low. Americans use only 6% of their land mass, we use less
than 2%. There is lots of wilderness left. It's all good. Repeat after me:
Kyoto is rubbish. David Anderson's policies are mad. Stephen Harper and the
Conservative party must articulate a clear attack on Kyoto. Then they will win.